Most Traditional Asset Managers Prefer Centralized Stablecoins
Read Time:1 Minute, 46 Second

Most Traditional Asset Managers Prefer Centralized Stablecoins

Stablecoins have surged in market capitalization from $130 billion to $280 billion since the end of 2023, underscoring their growing importance. Recent regulatory frameworks are enhancing their adoption within traditional finance settings.

In an interview with FinextraTV, Fabian Dori, chief investment officer at Sygnum Bank, discussed the implications for wealth management and the broader financial ecosystem:

“Regulatory frameworks are accelerating institutional adoption, allowing traditional asset managers to integrate stablecoins with greater ease. For many crypto-native asset managers, stablecoins are already central to their operations, and the groundwork is now being laid for traditional managers to also recognize their significance in the near future.”

Initially, stablecoins faced skepticism, but as regulatory structures have emerged, this distrust has begun to dissipate. The acceptance of stablecoins is increasing, particularly within the crypto asset landscape, while traditional finance is leaning more toward centralized variants.

“Regulated stablecoins now offer compelling value for institutional investors, as these frameworks define the licensing and collateralization requirements, along with reporting obligations and assurance reports. This infrastructure for regulated, typically centralized, stablecoins makes them a safer option for payment settlements from a traditional finance perspective.”

Dori emphasizes the need to distinguish between centralized and decentralized stablecoins concerning risk management. Centralized stablecoins tend to have a more straightforward risk profile, focusing primarily on custody and management issues:

“The key risk here is really all about concentration.”

In contrast, decentralized stablecoins operate as more autonomous assets, presenting different risks:

“They introduce less concentration risk, but the challenges center on the value of the underlying collateral basket, especially if it is hedged. There are regulatory considerations as well—such as whether the token is classified as a security—which complicate risk management regarding collateral value and hedging.”

Despite these risks, Dori believes the stability of both types of stablecoins is becoming more manageable and their future more predictable. He remains optimistic about their potential:

“I firmly believe that all assets will eventually be tokenized, and that stablecoins will be essential for enabling the full value of blockchain technology and automated processes. Both in the mid and long term, I see a bright future for stablecoins.”